Crouse v. Cyclops Industries

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2000-01-28

Cited by 270 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SAYLOR, Justice, concurring and dissenting. I join the majority in holding that the four-year statute of limitations should govern claims predicated on the theory of promissory estoppel. However, I agree with the Superior Court that Appellants’ claim is barred, as the record establishes that Appellants knew or had reason to know of the asserted breach more than four years prio…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.