Crosby v. Beam

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1989-12-20

Cited by 178 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Douglas, J. The issue before us is whether the appellees’ cause of action may be maintained as an individual action or whether dismissal was proper because the suit was not instituted as a Civ. R. 23.1 shareholder’s derivative suit. A shareholder’s derivative action is brought by a shareholder in the name of the corporation to enforce a corporate claim. 1 Such a suit is an exception…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.