Pfeifer, J., dissenting. I {¶ 60} The majority holds that the appellate court correctly held that the trial court erred in including a jury instruction on foreseeability, but concludes that *274 the appellate court failed to show that the jury instructions materially prejudiced the Cromers…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.