Folger, J. In this court, the appellants make four points: 1st. That the respondents were not entitled to damages, by reason of the removal of the Hamilton street bridge. 2d. Hor for the taking of lands near their’s, by which their’s were rendered less convenient for dockage and unloading, and thereby less valuable. 3d. FTor for injuries alleged to have been sustained by digging too…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.