Conner v. Burford

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1988-01-13

Cited by 243 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WALLACE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: The factual and procedural description in part I is adequate for our decision and I concur in parts II and IV. I dissent from part III. In part III, the majority concludes that the federal agencies involved here violated the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), <span class="citation no-l…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.