Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Decided 1993-06-08

Cited by 113 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Katz, J. The principal issues in these appeals are whether (1) the trial court improperly substituted its judgment for that of the defendant Wallingford zoning board of appeals (board) in determining that solid waste disposal is a valid nonconforming use of certain property that is located in the town of Wallingford, owned by the plaintiff city of Meriden and leased, in part, to the plaintiff Connecticut Resources Recovery Author…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.