Conklin v. Weisman

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 1996-07-18

Cited by 194 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by O’HERN, J. The primary issue in this legal malpractice action is whether plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial against their lawyer and his law firm based on the trial court’s charge to the jury regarding proximate cause. In its original form, that charge would, in essence, have required defendants’ negligence to h…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.