Commonwealth v. Washington

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2007-07-18

Cited by 587 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. I depart from the majority on several points. First, although the majority deems Claim IA (pertaining to the Teagle affidavit) waived based upon a technical defect in Appellant’s supplemental PCRA pleading, the PCRA court’s pre-dismissal notice did not identify this defect as a basis for dismissal. 1 Indeed, the court’s notice of its <…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.