Commonwealth v. Trefethen

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts · Decided 1892-10-19

Cited by 199 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Field, C. J. The principal exception is to the refusal of the court to admit the testimony of Sarah L. Hubert. The exceptions recite: “ Sarah L. Hubert, a witness called in behalf of the defendant, testified that her business, which she advertised in the newspapers, was that of a trance medium; that on December 22, 1891, in the forenoon, after ten o’clock, a young woman called at her place of busines…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.