Commonwealth v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2013-05-29

Cited by 180 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION Justice EAKIN. In this capital case, appellant, Paul Gamboa Taylor, appeals from the order of the PCRA court dismissing his third PCRA petition as untimely and finding trial counsel 1 did not have a conflict of interest during his representation of appellant. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. In the interest of clarity, a brief…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.