Commonwealth v. Spotz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2005-03-29

Cited by 105 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION Justice CASTILLE. The dispositive issue in these cross-appeals is whether the Superior Court erred in finding that trial counsel for appellee/cross-appellant Mark N. Spotz (“appellee”) was ineffective, as a matter of law, for failing to object to alleged prosecutorial references to appellee’s post-arrest silence. For the following reaso…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.