Commonwealth v. Smith

Decided 2016-08-25

Cited by 101 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CONCURRING OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: I concur because I agree with the result the majority has reached. I write separately, however, to note that my analysis would be different regarding whether the gun had an “altered” manufacturer’s number in accordance with 18 Pa.C.S. § 6110.2(a). The majority indicates that the expert’s opinion that the number had not been “altered” should be discounted bec…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.