Commonwealth v. Simala

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1969-04-23

Cited by 115 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dissenting Opinion by Mb. Justice Jones: I agree with the views expressed in the majority opinion in the following respects: (1) that, at the time of appellant’s oral statement, he was then “in custody” and that he was entitled to be given the Miranda warnings before being questioned; and (2) that the question whether appellant was at the time of the incident in the office of Mayor George the f…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.