Commonwealth v. SELENSKI

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2010-05-26

Cited by 140 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice SAYLOR, concurring and dissenting. I join the passages of the majority opinion through its treatment of the trial court’s and Superior Court’s opinions. However — since the court of original jurisdiction omitted the necessary, fact-sensitive, due-diligence inquiry — I would remand for that court to compete its task, rather than attempting to undertake it in the first inst…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.