Commonwealth v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2004-05-27

Cited by 164 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION Chief Justice CAPPY. 1 The issues with which we are presented question whether the police legally detained Edward Rogers (“Appellant”) and executed a canine search of Appellant’s vehicle. For the following reasons, we now affirm. On January 9, 1998, Trooper Michael Banovsky of the Pennsylvania State Police observed Appellant’s vehicle trave…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.