Commonwealth v. Rainey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2007-07-18

Cited by 306 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice EAKIN, concurring and dissenting. I join the majority opinion, with the exception of Section V(C), which remands to the PCRA court for testimony about trial counsel’s consideration of Appellant’s potential mental health problem. Majority Op., at 107-10, 928 A.2d at 239-41. As the majority indicates, this Court’s standard of review after the denial of…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.