Commonwealth v. Prisk

Decided 2011-01-28

Cited by 265 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING Statement by FITZGERALD, J.: I agree with the majority’s disposition on the wiretap issue. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority on the sentencing issue, as I would find that Appellant’s aggregate sentence of 633 to 1,500 years’ imprisonment is manifestly excessive. I would find that Appellant has raised a substantial question in arguing <…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.