Commonwealth v. Mouzon

Decided 2003-07-01

Cited by 118 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION BY STEVENS, J.: ¶ 1 This case returns to us on remand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, a plurality 1 of which found that our memorandum decision relied on the erroneous rationale that a sentence cannot, as a matter of law, be manifestly excessive when it is within statutory limits. After a review of Mouzon’s claim on the merits, 2 we af<pa…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.