Commonwealth v. Mitchell, W., Aplt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2014-12-16

Cited by 190 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice SAYLOR, concurring. I join the majority opinion for the most part. My only reservation is with some of the majority’s more affirmative statements concerning the character of Appellant’s proofs. For example, the majority deems Appellant’s post-conviction evidence to be “merely cumulative,” relative to mitigation evidence presented at the penalty stage of his trial. See Majority Opinion, at…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.