Commonwealth v. May

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2005-11-23

Cited by 158 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice NIGRO dissenting. I respectfully dissent, as I believe that the trial court erred in excluding all of the Smith daughters’ testimony regarding their in-prison meeting with Appellant and would therefore give him a new penalty phase hearing. In addressing Appellant’s claim, the majority limits its analysis to the statement of apology that Appellant made to the daughters during their v…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.