Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1980-04-28

Cited by 112 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ROBERTS, Justice, concurring and dissenting opinion. I agree with the majority that appellant’s conviction for obstructing the administration of law must be affirmed. The record clearly establishes that appellant’s abusive, threatening remarks to Ms. Young caused her fear and alarm and prevented her from properly performing her duties as a meter maid. I ca…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.