Commonwealth v. Koehler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2012-01-20

Cited by 573 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice SAYLOR, concurring. I join Parts 1(A), IV, V, VII, VIII and IX of the majority opinion and concur in the result for the balance. My most particular differences are as follows. Initially, I do not support the majority’s treatment of the Commonwealth’s non-disclosure of its agreement with witness Kirk Schrader, and specifically, the majority’s conclusion that “it strains logic to…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.