Commonwealth v. Gribble

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2004-12-21

Cited by 163 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice SAYLOR, concurring. I differ with the majority’s holding that Appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for withdrawing a severance motion is previously litigated on the basis that Appellant pursued a Bruton challenge to the Commonwealth’s use his co-defendant’s statement at the joint trial. See Majority Opinion, op. at 461-62. Although one aspect of the dispos…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.