Commonwealth v. Delaney

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts · Decided 1997-07-28

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Lynch, J. (dissenting). Today the court affirms a criminal conviction for violating a protective order that had not been *602 served on the defendant, even though G. L. c. 209A, § 7, 1 clearly requires such service and even though the prosecutor told the jury that service had been made. Accordingly, I dissent. It should be kept…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.