Commonwealth v. Davido

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2005-02-25

Cited by 114 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice CASTILLE concurring. I join the Majority Opinion with the exception of its analysis of appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in denying his request to represent himself at trial without first conducting a counsel waiver colloquy. In reaching the merits of this claim, the Majority rejects the Commonwealth’s argument that the claim is waived because appellant’s lawyers never requested a counsel…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.