Commonwealth v. Darush

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1983-04-28

Cited by 164 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ROBERTS, Chief Justice, dissenting. I agree with the majority that the circumstances of this case, including the trial judge’s inability to deny making remarks that could call his impartiality into question, merit the granting of relief to appellant. However, I cannot agree with the majority’s decision to limit that relief to the sentencing stage of appellant’s case. The requirement of Canon…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.