Commonwealth v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1978-03-23

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*411 ROBERTS, Justice, concurring. I agree with the plurality that appellee should not be discharged under Rule 1100. I do so, however, not because the record shows a reasonable explanation for the inability to try appellee timely, but because the proceedings in this case occurred before our decision in Commonwealth v. Mayfield, <span class="…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.