Commonwealth v. Brooks

Decided 2010-10-07

Cited by 202 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

DISSENTING OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: Because the Commonwealth failed to establish when the offenses against G.W. occurred with any particularity, defendant’s fundamental due process rights were violated and, therefore, I respectfully dissent. This case stems from Brooks’ alleged abuse of C.B. and G.W. Brooks is the biological father of C.B. and formerly the boyfriend of G.W.’s decea…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.