Commonwealth v. Bracalielly

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1995-05-16

Cited by 148 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*477 ZAPPALA, Justice, concurring and dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the decision of Commonwealth v. Bracalielly. As the majority notes, the principal case defining what constitutes a single criminal episode is Commonwealth v. Hude. In Hude, </e…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.