Commonwealth v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2007-08-23

Cited by 1,216 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice SAYLOR, Dissenting. The majority repeatedly invokes the plain meaning of Section 9545(b)(l)(ii) of the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(h) (providing for an exception to the PCRA’s one-year time bar when “the facts upon which the claim is predicated were unknown to the petitioner and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence”), in support of its conclusion that t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.