Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2009-12-28

Cited by 250 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice SAYLOR, concurring. I join the majority opinion, except for footnote 6, because I do not see mischief in labeling the Blockburger test a “pure” or “strict” elements one, as a number of other jurisdictions do. Conceptually, I agree with the majority that many criminal offenses may be established via alternative methods of proof, and therefore, can be said to encompass alternative elements. Conse…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.