Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · Decided 1902-03-10

Cited by 142 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SANBORN, Circuit Judge, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The main question in this case is whether or not the answer states a legal counterclaim. The basis of this counterclaim is that the plaintiff failed to deliver nuts, bolts, and bars between June i, 1899, and December 1, 1899, under the alleged renewal of the so-called contract of October 27, 1898. This supposed contract c…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.