Coker v. Coker

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1983-05-04

Cited by 2,498 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SPEARS, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I do not believe that the property settlement agreement entered into by the Cokers is ambiguous. If a written instrument can be given a definite interpretation, it is not ambiguous and the court will construe the contract as a matter of law. R P Enterprises v. La Guarta, Gavrel Kirk, Inc., <span class="citation" data-…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.