Per Curiam. The issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court correctly ruled that the signatory status of the parties was conclusively established by Cleveland Trust’s requests for admissions. We hold that the trial court was correct in that ruling. Civ. R. 36 requires that when requests for admissions are filed by a party, the opposing party must timely respond either by objection or answer.…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.