Clay K. James v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · Decided 2002-09-17

Cited by 113 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, twenty-one former employees of Defendant Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation (“Pirelli” or “the company”) or its predecessor in interest, Armstrong Rubber Company (“Armstrong”), appeal from the judgment dismissing their claims of breach of fiduciary duty arising under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ER…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.