Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided 1989-06-22

Cited by 172 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Clarke, Presiding Justice. In this case we are called upon to interpret the meaning of the “pollution exclusion” clause of a comprehensive general liability insurance policy. For the reasons stated below, we hold that the insurance policy at issue does not preclude coverage for liability for environmental contamination caused by the discharge of pollutants over an extended period of time. Briefly stated, t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.