Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, Superintendent

U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · Decided 1975-05-27

Cited by 128 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge (dissenting). With all due respect, I feel required to dissent on the ground that under the circumstances reflected by the record, as a matter of logic as well as of law, no purported finding of fact inconsistent with the transcript can have validity. In my view, a reading of the plain language contained in the appendix to the majority opinion clearly demonstrates its inconsisten…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.