Clancy v. Zale Corp.

Decided 1986-02-19

Cited by 282 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

GUILLOT, Justice. David Clancy appeals from a take-nothing judgment in favor of appellees, Zale Corporation, Rogers Research and Development, Inc., the Arms Corporation of America, and Armsco Distributing Company and their subsidiaries (collectively referred to hereinafter as “Zale”). For the reasons below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Clancy…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.