City of Maumee v. Geiger

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1976-03-10

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. The question presented is whether a person may properly be tried and convicted for receiving *240 stolen property after he admits the actual, theft of that same property. ■ ' Section 134.17 of the Maumee Municipal Code and R. C. 2913.51 use the same language to identify the crime of receiving stolen property: “No person shall recei…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.