Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Decided 1976-01-27

Cited by 205 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge: This appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion to disqualify plaintiff’s counsel presents a somewhat unusual set of facts. Counsel has been disqualified from further representation of plaintiff because a partner in this New York City law firm is also a partner in a Buffalo firm which is presently representing the defendant Cinerama, Inc.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.