Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hall

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1913-06-09

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Lamar, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court. Hall, a married man, head of a family and insolvent,. worked as a switchman for the railroad company in Nebraska, his wages being exempt from garnishment by the laws of that State. While temporarily absent in Iowa, two suits were there brought against him, sum…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.