Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

Decided 1986-09-02

Cited by 137 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Callahan, J. This is an appeal by the commission on human rights and opportunities (hereinafter CHRO) on behalf of the complainant Kenneth Barboza, from a judgment of the Superior Court, reversing the decision of a CHRO hearing officer. The dispositive issue is the nature of the evidentiary burdens placed on the complainant and respondent in a housing discrimination action. The tribunal found that Chestnut Realty, Inc. (hereinaft…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.