Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · Decided 1999-03-01

Cited by 109 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent from the decision of the majority for two reasons. First, I believe the majority errs as a matter of law in its reading of the sham exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, and thereby diminishes by judicial interpretation the scope of the Sherman Act, a seminal congressional enactment. Second, I believe the .facts of record are sufficient to withstand s…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.