Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. Jorling

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1995-02-09

Cited by 131 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Ciparick, J. (dissenting). We are all in agreement that the Commissioner may restrict the use of DEBT in high concentrations. We also agree that registrations for pesticide products not in compliance with the proposed DEBT concentration rule must be cancelled pursuant to title 7. We differ with the majority concerning the nature and content of the title 7 cancellation proceedings. Specifically, the majority holds that the scientif…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.