Charlie Jackson v. R. Fong

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2017-08-31

Cited by 109 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

McCALLA, District Court Judge, concurring in judgment: I concur in the judgment alone. The district court improperly determined Jackson had not exhausted his claims, not because the PLRA was inapplicable to his post-release third amended complaint, but because Jackson’s failure to exhaust is excusable under § 1997e(a). Exhaustion under the PLRA.is measured at the time the action is file…

Topics: criminal sentencing

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.