Chambers-Castanes v. King County

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1983-09-15

Cited by 207 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dimmick, J. (concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur with the majority that appellants should be allowed to attempt to prove intentional infliction of severe emotional distress. However, notwithstanding sympathy for the *296 appellants who were victims of senseless criminal acts, I would not allow their cause of action for neglige…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.