Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Supreme Court of California · Decided 2001-02-01

Cited by 222 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KENNARD, J.— I dissent. The majority holds that standard language in a comprehensive general liability (CGL) insurance policy, under which the liability carrier promises to indemnify the insured for “all sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages,” does not obligate the carrier to pay the costs of complying with an administrative order to m…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.