Cen-Pen Corporation v. Walter E. Hanson Loraine P. Hanson

U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · Decided 1995-06-22

Cited by 176 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

From the opinion

HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. In my view, the bankruptcy court correctly decided that under the facts in this case the confirmation of the Hansons’ Chapter 13 plan vested the residence in the Hansons free and clear of encumbrances. The debtor believed that Cen-Pen was an unsecured creditor; Cen-Pen believed to the contrary. In their Chapter 13 plan, the H…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗

Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.