Castrol, Inc. v. Quaker State Corporation, Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation, and Grey Advertising, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Decided 1992-10-07

Cited by 117 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WALKER, Circuit Judge: A Quaker State television commercial asserts that “tests prove” its 10W-30 motor oil provides better protection against engine wear at start-up. In a thoughtful opinion reported at 1992 WL 47981 (S.D.N.Y. March 2, 1992), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Charles S. Haight, Judge) h…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.