Castle v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit · Decided 2002-08-19

Cited by 115 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. This is a Winstar-related case. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims,” or “trial court”) held that two of the plaintiffs, John K. Castle (“Castle”) and Leonard M. Harlan (“Harlan”), were parties to a contract that the government breached by enacting the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIR-REA…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.